Skip to main content

SDSU Completer Impact Data

CAEP 4.1 Completer Impact Data 2017-2021

SDSU partnered with two School Districts to identify a sample of program completers from the last five years. Due to how MAP data is reported, we were only able to extract individual data for a sample of eleven teachers from partner districts.

SDSU was provided a sample of K-12 test scores from the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Growth Assessment. This assessment is a computerized adaptive test that helps teachers, parents and administrators improve learning for students and make informed decisions that promote a child’s academic growth. The assessment is administered at three points in the academic year; Fall, Winter and Spring. Partner districts administer the assessment at all grade levels. Students take both a Reading and Mathematics test.

The initial sample included MAP Growth Assessment scores for seven Early Childhood completers.

TeacherGrade LevelSDSU Graduate TeamHire Date
Teacher 1K20172017-2018 AY
Teacher 2120182018-2019 AY
Teacher 3220182018-2019 AY
Teacher 4120192019-2020 AY
Teacher 5K20192019-2020 AY
Teacher 6K20192019-2020 AY

The first metric we examined was the Mean RIT Scores for K-12 students taught by our completers for each academic year. A RIT score is an estimation of a student's instructional level and also measures student progress or growth in school. The RIT scale measures student performance, regardless of whether they’re performing on, above, or below grade level. Below are the mean RIT scores for K-12 students taught by our completers. The table also provides a comparison mean RIT score that is based on national achievement in the same subject area and grade level.

The teachers’ students in this sample are performing at or above their peers at the national level. In mathematics, the students taught by our graduates scored above the benchmark for their grade in every academic year that was reviewed.

Mean RIT Score MAP Growth; Reading Assessment

Teacher2017-20182018-20192019-20202020-2021
Teacher 1175.56182.98163.12173.19
Teacher 1 - Benchmark for Grade Level141.05140.45146.28146.28
Teacher 2-191.97175.43178.32
Teacher 2 - Benchmark for Grade Level-175.78171.40171.40
Teacher 3-181.45186.50189.07
Teacher 3 - Benchmark for Grade Level-179.54185.57185.57
Teacher 4--178.34189.52
Teacher 4 - Benchmark for Grade Level--171.40171.40
Teacher 5--174.89177.51
Teacher 5 - Benchmark for Grade Level--146.28146.28
Teacher 6--159.34161.23
Teacher 6 - Benchmark for Grade Level--146.28146.28
     

 

Mean RIT Score MAP Growth; Mathematics Assessment

Teacher2017-20182018-20192019-20202020-2021
Teacher 1160.67165.29161.32169.25
Teacher 1 - Benchmark for Grade Level153.23159.54157.11157.11
Teacher 2-177.95178.78181.55
Teacher 2 - Benchmark for Grade Level-173.42176.40176.40
Teacher 3-191.25196.33193.06
Teacher 3 - Benchmark for Grade Level-188.40189.42189.42
Teacher 4--179.56176.89
Teacher 4 - Benchmark for Grade Level--176.40176.40
Teacher 5--160.22162.12
Teacher 5 - Benchmark for Grade Level--157.11157.11
Teacher 6--163.26160.53
Teacher 6 - Benchmark for Grade Level--157.11157.11

In terms of measuring growth, we looked at Average Mean Growth, Fall to Spring for all completers and compared it to the national mean growth at the same grade level for the same time period. This metric shows the amount of growth in scores from Fall to Spring semesters. Scores were consistently above the growth norm for their grade level for all years.

Average Growth, Fall to Spring; Reading

Teacher2017-20182018-20192019-20202020-2021
Teacher 119.5820.0921.3519.27
Teacher 1 - Benchmark for Grade Level16.4516.4516.4516.45
Teacher 2-21.9417.5220.10
Teacher 2 - Benchmark for Grade Level-15.4715.4715.47
Teacher 3-17.2014.3918.86
Teacher 3 - Benchmark for Grade Level-13.2213.2213.22
Teacher 4--16.3418.45
Teacher 4 - Benchmark for Grade Level--15.4715.47
Teacher 5--19.5621.43
Teacher 5 - Benchmark for Grade Level--16.4516.45
Teacher 6--18.0519.43
Teacher 6 - Benchmark for Grade Level--16.4516.45
     


Average Growth, Fall to Spring; Mathematics

Teacher2017-20182018-20192019-20202020-2021
Teacher 119.7621.3318.4519.89
Teacher 1 - Benchmark for Grade Level17.5417.5417.5417.54
Teacher 2-15.4015.3318.23
Teacher 2 - Benchmark for Grade Level-16.3516.3516.35
Teacher 3-20.8215.0719.34
Teacher 3- Benchmark for Grade Level-14.3814.3814.38
Teacher 4--19.6619.48
Teacher 4 - Benchmark for Grade Level--16.3516.35
Teacher 5--18.7418.33
Teacher 5 - Benchmark for Grade Level--17.5417.554
Teacher 6--15.5819.58
Teacher 6 - Benchmark for Grade Level--17.5417.54

Each student is assigned a growth goal for each administration of the MAP assessment. The tables below show the percentage of students in the SDSU graduates class who met their growth goal from the Fall to Spring semesters.

Percentage of Students Met Growth Goal; Reading

Teacher2017-20182018-20192019-20202020-2021
Teacher 169%71%71%70%
Teacher 2-82%79%78%
Teacher 3-68%53%74%
Teacher 4--55%69%
Teacher 5--58%64%
Teacher 6- 61%73%

Percentage of Students Met Growth Goal; Mathematics

Teacher2017-20182018-20192019-20202020-2021
Teacher 175%80%66%79%
Teacher 2-63%54%69%
Teacher 3-72%61%75%
Teacher 4--51%53%
Teacher 5--49%54%
Teacher 6--54%65%

 


The following sample data come from a partner district as of the 2020-2021 academic year; thus, only one year of data is represented.

TeacherGrade LevelSDSU Graduation YearSDSU ProgramHire Date
Teacher 132014ECE2014-2015
Teacher 2High School2013English2013-2014
Teacher 3High School2004Ag Education2005-2006
Teacher 432013ECE2013-2014
Teacher 562017ECE2017-2018

Math K-12

TeacherFall RITSpring RITDifferencePercentage Met
Teacher 1188.00203.4815.4871%
Teacher 4196.10210.7414.6462%
Teacher 5216.58226.059.4768.5%

Reading 

TeacherFall RITSpring RITDifferencePercentage Met
Teacher 1187.28201.7614.4871%
Teacher 4194.38206.1711.7962%
Teacher 5214.87217.292.4248%

Algebra I

TeacherFall RITSpring RITDifferencePercentage Met
Teacher 2234.15236.452.332%
Teacher 3226230.254.2538%

Algebra II

TeacherFall RITSpring RITDifferencePercentage Met
Teacher 3194.38206.1711.7962%

Geometry

TeacherFall RITSpring RITDifferencePercentage Met
Teacher 2255.33256.51.170%
Teacher 3231.75233.758.8260%

Reading

TeacherFall RITSpring RITDifferencePercentage Met
Teacher 2223.26223.13-.1331%
Teacher 3218.59215.34-3.2532%

SDSU graduates have growth rates comparative with, and in some cases beyond, peers. The low percentage met rates in math and reading in HS is in keeping with district benchmarks. We will continue to monitor how we can better prepare teacher candidates to meet these challenges and help students to achieve growth goals, particularly in math and reading.